Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 May 2006 16:31:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3117 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> The NXT to NXT communication works very well, and is easy to use. Here's some
> video of an NXT controller for an NXT robot...
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hassenplug/Robots/NXT/nxtremotecontrol.wmv
Neat! You used the NXT motors as inputs on the remote control? How stiff are
they when you do that?
Also, I noticed at one point you scooted the controller closer to the car. Was
that because it had lost the signal? What is the effective range, anyway?
I also wonder what happens when you have more than two NXT bricks in the area.
How do you sort out signals from multiple sources?
Thanks,
- Joe
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Yep (at least that's one way to do it). I tried making a X-Y joystick, but the mechnical slop was more than I liked, so I've got one with two paddles and a thumbwheel (slightly different from Steve's) (...) Not too bad. The NXT motors are not (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) The motors offer little resistance when used this way. However, there's something else which I think is kind of cool. If you look close, when I let go of the controller, the paddles return to the middle, and the car stops. Using just one block (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
