Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 May 2006 14:55:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3200 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, David Hurley wrote:
>
> Also, since the NDA is done, how's reverse engineering going with things like
> NQC for NXT?
As Brian already mentioned I have produced a compiler for a text-based language
(assembly) which is called Next Byte Codes (NBC) for a number of complicated
reasons. Michael Barrett Anderson, who is the father of LASM and the RCX
firmware, has been working very closely with me and he has something incredibly
cool in the works (which I will let him announce when the time is right).
You can get NBC from the BricxCC pages at: http://bricxcc.sourceforge.net/
Now that I have posted a beta of the NBC compiler I am attempting to shift gears
to NQC.
John Hansen
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Quite muddy! Why only three connections and what about specification adherence? Are they trying to limit its potential applications or were they just trying to get out a production-ready implementation? In other words are there plans for an (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
