Subject:
|
Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 May 2006 19:15:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3210 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, David Hurley wrote:
> >
> > I can't speak for the NXT, but knowing that it has BT, and should be adhering to
> > the specs, then the answer would be yes. The master-slave communication is
> > coordinated via time slots within a piconet.
>
> Dave,
>
> I don't know a whole lot about BT (beyond the little I've found out because of
> this project), but your assessment is correct.
>
> The protocol is implemented according to BT spec, so all communication is done
> through master-slave communication.
>
> The thing that's confusing in my (and Brian's) explanation is that any NXT can
> be a master, with three slaves, AND can be a slave to one master.
>
> There is no direct slave to slave communication, and no master to master
> communication.
>
> The fact that any NXT can be a master and/or a slave allows you to bypass the
> four-connection limit.
>
> Any less muddy? :)
>
> Steve
Yes just kinda murky now! There are still good opportunities for a wireless
network of NXT's! One could write a program on a single master and control as
many lower level NXT's as you could bring together! Like one general commanding
three lieutennants who in turn each command three seargents, etc...So you get a
small army of these buggers doing thy bidding!!! muahh ahh ahh ahh...
Dave H.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Dave, I don't know a whole lot about BT (beyond the little I've found out because of this project), but your assessment is correct. The protocol is implemented according to BT spec, so all communication is done through master-slave (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
