Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Purism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:07:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2066 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Paul Andrews writes:
> I too like working within the existing constraints. It makes you creative.
> Still. I'd kill for a stall sensor.
Despite my urge to make new and better(?) sensors, Lego makes a stall sensor!
Stick a rotation sensor in the drive train and timeout a change in count
value. (Same way as automated braking system do.)
JB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO Purism
|
| (...) Yes. Guess I'm going to have to do it. The more I think about it. The more attractive the programming and mechanical issues become. Like: I have a two-motor setup. How do I monitor both or do I go for a synchro drive instead? Do I want to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO Purism
|
| (...) I too like working within the existing constraints. It makes you creative. Still. I'd kill for a stall sensor. (23 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
