Subject:
|
RE: Spybotics vs Cricket
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:33:49 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
KrzysFl <krzysfl@(Spamless)polbox.com>
|
Viewed:
|
1035 times
|
| |
|
|
Please move me out from the mailing list.
-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf Of
ken koleda
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 9:56 PM
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: Spybotics vs Cricket
Does this mean RCX 2.0 will go away?
In lugnet.robotics, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> Forgive me if this has already been discussed.. I haven't followed all
> messages here.
>
>
> I was at TLC's presentation of Spybotics at BF. There, it was described
> as, "the next generation of RCX." Knowing it has 2 sensor inputs and 2
> motor outs, I wonder how much it's like the Media Lab's Cricket (their
> next brick after the programmable brick that led to the RCX). And for
> that matter, how it compares to Fred Martin's Handy Cricket (which works
> with some, but not all LEGO sensors and is available for public
> consumption).
>
> http://llk.media.mit.edu/projects/cricket/
> http://www.handyboard.com/cricket/
>
> If one were to invest in either Spybotics or a Handy Cricket, what would
> you advise?
>
> -Suz
-------------------- [POLBOX - REKLAMA] ------------------------
Samochody, RTV-AGD - do 20% taniej ni¿ w sklepie
STOP - SPRAWD¬ CENÊ - www.agencjacenowa.pl, 0-801 666 777
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
