 | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | What a waste. To highlight a post about someone's hiatus?!? He said he’d be back… Anyway, like it matterz Can we stick to more relevant topics for highlighting in the future? . .. ... .... ..... ...... ....... ........ Spydèr ........ ...... ..... (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | (...) I think it is a case of why he is leaving that got it highlighted not so much that he is leaving. Tim was a great advocate for LUGNET and it is very disturbing that he feels he has to walk away for a while. (...) It does to some of us who have (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Adrian Egli
|
| | | | | | | I'll admit I'm feeling like some others here do. Tim has always played an important role here on Lugnet but, a partial quote, "Lugnet is a somewhat compartamentalized RTL". There are still times when I find it worth posting something (like the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | RE: On Hiatus —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | | (...) IMO, the problem is that people seem to think the noise is more important than the content. To me, the content on LUGNET is the MOCs and the related building discussion. Noise is people bickering about why they can't get along...which leads to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Definitely. What is happening to Lugnet anyway? (...) Hmm...The community should really think about this. What exactly Is Lugnet and why was it instated? I'll tell you. Lugnet is the medium for Lego fans like you and me to discuss matters (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) [...] (...) Thank-you, Bram. My thoughts exactly... -Suz (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general) !!
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I guess that means the conversation is over, the admin thinks it's noise. Jude FUT o-t.debate (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) People who spotlight messages should think carefully about the type of posts they think are appropriate for the LUGNET shop window: ie "Top Stories" on www.lugnet.com Although Tim is well meaning, I really doubt his melodramatics belong there. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ummmh...Scott...we know already...subject matter should be already closed... thanks...don't open another can of worms... Benjamin Medinets (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Benjamin, All I am doing is stating my view. You may/may not like my view, but I'm sure you will agree that I'm entitled to it. I suppose the alternative would be for admins to highlight threads as "closed"? FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate Scott (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Obviously you don’t. I did have to explain myself several times over… And he’s got as much a right to post as you do Ben. Just cause you’ve already said your points dozen’t mean everyone else has to walk away. Try not to dictate to others so (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | | | Interesting how you presume to talk on his behalf… And all the others who posted… Anyway… (...) That's all well and good. For you can e-mail him as much as you want, you can leave as many happy-goodbye messages in the .peoples section as you wish, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey Spider, I think you missed the point... yes people do come and go all the time, BUT... Tim wasn't "just another user"... he had passion not only for making the Lego Community a better place, but also LUGNET. Its your attitude and others (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | | (...) Definitely. Spyder has nothing to back those words up with, and Tim was a great guy who was only trying to better Lugnet. A word of advice to Spyder. Please think before you post. You'd be amazed what some people do before thinking, and some (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | | | | | I'm happy for the two of you and your special relationship. <grins> But this iz not the issue... (...) Back those words up? So you want me to tally up just how constructive Tim has been to the community and thus compare his endeavors to that of the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Funny, very funny. Isn't it against the TOS to throw in nasty comments. (...) Fine. Be as negative as you want. There's no need to add more negativity to Lugnet as it is. Use your time more wisely. I, for instance don't spend 10 out of 11 (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | | | Geezzzzzzz… Where do I begin? You so completely misconstrued my point that I dumbfounded at the amount of reiteration I'll have to clarify… (...) First-off its ‘Spydèr’ not Spider… o.k. Bem Nedinets… ;) And secondly, I don’t think I'm the one (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) If I've read your clarifications right, your point is what is appropriate for the highlights section. (...) I for one respect the amount of effort that Tim has put forth to further the L-CAD community. The fact that he's earned (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Chris Giddens
|
| | | | | | | Is it just me or does this guy come off a bit "Troll-ish"? Doing a search on Rico Lovelace turns up mostly posts in debates and little to do with Lego. (URL) wonderin'... and if you're not a Troll, Spyder, my sincerest apologies. Chris <>< (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'm not a Troll! And therefore i accept your apologies... . .. ... .... ..... ...... ....... ........ Spydèr ........ ...... ..... .... ... .. . Fading back into the night… (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | "Spydèr" <spyders_(obscure)we...tmail.com> wrote in message news:GsqDCr.21G@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) Then why not use your real name? (...) directly (...) that (...) we (...) [ ... lots of snippage .... ] This response had some reasonable (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) Watch it Michael! Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself. Therefore, all (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | | | (...) Rico, it's not hard to findz... (...) Some people like cuttin' the 'g' off the end of ing. I don't eg: needin' keepin' sleepin' I guess i just like the zest of 'z' ? . .. ... .... ..... ...... ....... ........ Spydèr ........ ...... ..... .... (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: On Hiatus —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, I for one never would have seen that thread had someone not highlighted it. Seems to me the waste is someone wasting bandwidth complaining about someone wasting bandwidth. [1] -John [1] Unless it's someone posting that someone is wasting (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —Rico Lovelace
|
| | | | (...) I didn’t complain about “Bandwidth!” Only about relevant topics on the announcement board. Try to stay on topic…. I never once said anything about his post being a waste of space. Or any of the other posts for that matter. I just questioned (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On Hiatus —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Revelant? To what? To whom? You? (...) My concern is with your post. So somebody highlighted it? So what? Why do you feel as if you need to somehow micro-manage behavior on LUGNET? You probably would have had a coronary a while back when folks (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
