 | | Guess what. —Derek Raycraft
|
| | | Just ran my bot here at home and I did the anti X in 19.94 seconds with a placement score of 75. (7 perfect, 1 good) I don't know what was so different about the library. I got none of the spastic behaviour I was getting at the there. Its so (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Guess what. —Mario DeFacendis
|
| | | | | What a bummer Derek! I would have loved to see your bot run (especially at 19.94 seconds). The worst thing is that Chris would have been bumped down into 3rd place -- non-prize territory! Easy insurance against similar problems in the future: how (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Guess what. —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | | (...) OK, someone let the genie out of the bottle. Pandora's box is open. GAME ON!!! i was going to be a little meek, BUT clearly NOT!! So, I have given this some thought and the mockage shall flow this way: Rob Chris Phil ALL OTHER (who brought a (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Guess what. —Jeff Van Winden
|
| | | | | | YAHOO!!! I have PERMISSION to make fun of Chris's robot..... SO.... Hmmmm.... I can't think of anything creative.... DOH! Jeff VW "Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C793216.B6E79D...ers.com... (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Guess what. —Rob Stehlik
|
| | | | | (...) Man, that sucks. I loved your robot, and I really wanted to see it work. hte design was just beautiful. Maybe you can keep it together and show us all sometime? Maybe we will do pick and place again? I, for one see lots of room for improvement (...) (22 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Guess what. —John Guerquin
|
| | | | | | | (...) How did you power the LEGO light Rob? Did you wire the light sensor itself to the light, thereby using the current that the RCX sends out to active sensors to power the light? Or did you use an external battery box? John (22 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Guess what. —Rob Stehlik
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Battery box. Running ot off of the power supplied to the sensor is an interesting idea, but I doubt it would work very well. The light is brightest with a full 9V. I think the light sensor only recieves 5V or less. Rob (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Guess what. —Derek Raycraft
|
| | | | | | (...) I'd love to do a contest like this again. Maybe modify it at little to change things up, but keep the basic concept the same. I was thinking for a tougher contest, beyond this one, we could turn the board up on its side, and stack the blocks. (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Guess what. —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) omgoodness!! I love this idea! It'll have to be done with multiple RCX's fer sure! We use the 4 stud cubes that we used for block stacking/sorting, et al... White and Black, and see what happens! Oh so many ideas!!! Dave (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Guess what. —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | (...) Welcome to the club. As of thursday night, mine was running the anti-x in about 29 seconds - some patterns in 27 seconds, although, my robot doesn't do a pre-scan and therefore has to search every square in the X, there isn't a lot of (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Guess what. —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | (...) Well, since Mario's already responded to this thread, he won't complain about me replying :) We had the xEmployees entry running at the cube again this afternoon to disassemble, but before we started taking it apart, we had to show it to a (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Guess what. —Rob Stehlik
|
| | | | | (...) I really liked your gripper... I thought I had taken a picture of it, but I must not have... Anywone else have a picture of the retro wonder?? This is a combined function (...) Like you said, timing is pretty consistent, but motor speed (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | 110 VAC powered lego motors —Chris Magno
|
| | | | in some other thread, Mathias said: (...) I don't follow this. if 110 VAC (or some amount) goes in, it drops down to 9 (ish) i know for a fact that the RCX does not have a transformer, so the regulation has to be solid state..... ergo, somewhere in (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Trevyn Watson
|
| | | | | Wall current is not the same everywhere. It is not even always the same over time. I measured my wall voltage once, and it was 117. Now it's 120. Most wall wart adapters drop the voltage by a specific amount, so if the designers of a 9v adapter were (...) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | (...) It's two "t"'s Mr. Mango :-) (...) My point here is this: I was using the Lego train transformer, which is just that: a transformer (10:1 ie. 120VAC in yields 12VAC out - no regulation, no filtering) If the voltage at the wall drops 8.3% (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | (...) I am sorry. I was doing it from memory, and i thought I did so well by remembering the combination of "hias" that I forgot the easy part of Matt. As you (and all of Lugnet) are aware, I am a very poor speller. I don't know why, I always have (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | | | (...) That's O.K. Truth be known, It was actually just an excuse to tease you with the long-running, heavily-worn "Mango" joke. (...) So why don't you guys share it with the rest of us? I have to wonder how much interesting and potentially useful (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree, except I've been told in private by several rtlToronto folk that they don't feel welcome on Lugnet with the recent visit by your friendly community police. It bugs me too to revert rtlToronto back into the endless pre-rtl6 back and (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | (...) If you've ever wondered what newsgroup you're in on Lugnet, and you read "I dragged out my variac", you know you're in rtlToronto, because: a) People here have variacs b) People here know what variacs are c) People are not afraid to say they (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | (...) OK, 2 points. 1. I came in SECOND!!!! i have the ribbon to prove it. ;) 2. We (Matthias and I) are working on ways to improve future robots. as a sub plot, this give him the opportunity to as for schematics for the RCX even more. And lastly, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, but the overall plot arc is that you're all still trying to figure out why your ProjectXen didn't beat Rob or didn't function properly. And as we all know, rtlToronto's primary lesson is: Reality is Hard. Mario brings in our robot on (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, let's get a final idea for rtl11, or are we holding out until after robosoccer? I am really liking the idea of having a "simple" competition, combined with whatever other competition there may be. The one I'm being drawn to is the (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Phil Schilling
|
| | | | | | (...) HI Everybody Why don't we just do it on the floor and have a line 12" after the finish line and you can't cross it or you're DQed. This is less risky and Lego won't go crashing onto the floor. I hate that sound now! It hurt to much the last (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —David Schilling
|
| | | | | | (...) Just a note about dragsters, having done them recently in SMART: I would recommend a very long track, and a very short stopping zone. EG: Track: 20 meters, and stopping zone: 20 cm, or perhaps even 10 cm. This definitely wouldn't be a 'night (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Iain Hendry
|
| | | | | | "David Schilling" <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote in message news:GsBy09.A1H@lugnet.com... (...) 20 (...) actually (...) David, I agree with you completly! I love the idea of having a long runway with very short stoping zone followed by a cliff. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Chris Magno
|
| | | | | | | (...) this is a nice idea, BUT the library is only so long. and... we would have to find a smooth flat surface for that entire distance. at best it might be 3 tables with a bit of tape to join the seams. would you recommend walls along the sides?? (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Iain Hendry
|
| | | | | | | | "Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C80E237.29D259...ers.com... (...) NO! No walls. :) Okay. 3 tables of very close heightnessey. Duct tape across the seams (or some coloured tape with equiv. light sensor values. Oh no! My phone (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Racing towards oblivion —David Schilling
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Agreed. No walls. But there should be a line that the robots can follow so they go reasonably straight. Even the best robots will wander a little if you don't give some sort of clue as to where they should be going. I suggest that the finish (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Calum Tsang
|
| | | | | | (...) Preventative maintenance, right :) Calum (22 years ago, 2-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | (...) Actually, IIRC, Chris and I have a common problem: families orphaned by X-bots. To redeem ourselves, we need to prove that it was all worth it. Chris did quite well and has been vindicated, ensuring that he no longer needs to sleep on the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 110 VAC powered lego motors —Chris Magno
|
| | | | (...) please don't :) Chris (22 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
