rtlToronto : 15261


Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 15261	15260 \| 15262

Subject:	Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:23:27 GMT
Viewed:	710 times

In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote: > Basically it doesn't have to be a 8 stud by 7 brick by 4 stud tunnel. Right, just a 8 dot by 7 brick frame that is a dot thick. But there should be a physical space 3 dots deep behind it. > Ah, is he saying I can have a tool that hangs over the front of the > TO as long as it's a moveable tool. For example a sensor on an arm > could move around the outside of my robot, but I couldn't permanently > mount one in a way the would obstruct the TO. I originally wrote it such that if you were to put a tool in front of the TO, then it needs to be collapsable flat to the surface of the TO. But I'm wondering if we shouldn't just say nothing should obstruct the TO? Calum

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
(...) In a sense you're messing yourself up if you do. If I can't deliver a brick into your robot because you stuck something in the way it's your loss. But then it's also my loss because I'm wasting time trying to interface properly but I can't (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
(...) No, I just wanted clarification. 16 studs on centre is fine with me. (...) I'm happy with that. (...) So you are saying there should be clearance for a EOAT to enter to at least 4 studs into the TO. But as long as my TO opening is 8 studs by 7 (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

30 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search