Subject:
|
Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:54:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
646 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote:
> To clarify, before Calum flips out, written evidence is always taken
> over what someone supposedly said. Just look at someone we knows
> phone bill or the fact my arguments at dinner were ignored when
> composing the rule about whether the light should stay on or not. :-)
>
> Ok Calum, now you can flip out.
In my book, it doesn't become legal until it hits the webpage, because that is
what everyone checks on as the reference.
-To ask someone to keep track of the NG (the fastest moving group on Lugnet) is
unreasonable for basic rules.
-It took me about five minutes to find that colour post and I knew what I was
looking for and who wrote it.
Chris wanted people to post stuff adhoc, without defining anything basic, and
frankly, one cannot do that when designing a competition.
But either way, it's moot: the page is the reference.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
