rtlToronto : 15247


Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 15247	15246 \| 15248

Subject:	Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
Newsgroups:	lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:00:27 GMT
Viewed:	747 times

On 22-Nov-05, at 10:57 PM, Derek Raycraft wrote: > > (Note that this is a great example of how "social experimentation" > > can't be > > trusted for anything--is Dave right? Is Janey right? Who decides?) > > > This is not an example of anything. > > Dave called white here: > > http://news.lugnet.com/org/ca/rtltoronto/?n=14681 > > You called white here: > > http://news.lugnet.com/org/ca/rtltoronto/?n=14682 > > Dave's message predates yours, I'm sorry you loose. To clarify, before Calum flips out, written evidence is always taken over what someone supposedly said. Just look at someone we knows phone bill or the fact my arguments at dinner were ignored when composing the rule about whether the light should stay on or not. :-) Ok Calum, now you can flip out. Derek

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
(...) In my book, it doesn't become legal until it hits the webpage, because that is what everyone checks on as the reference. -To ask someone to keep track of the NG (the fastest moving group on Lugnet) is unreasonable for basic rules. -It took me (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
(...) I feel the light should be on at all times, but like Calum I feel it should be open for discussion. First of follow up Calum's points. (...) Robots don't need to be stopped to transfer a brick, personally I'm working on the principle that I'll (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

30 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search