Subject:
|
Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Draft Rules Posted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:33:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
679 times
|
| |
|
|
Calum Tsang wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
>
>>MORE specifialy. it could be a safe assumption that if your bot can
>>launch a block over more than 8 feet of the play area, and still hit a
>>childs eye with enough force to cause injury. THAT would be "firing
>>bricks violently"
>
>
> Okay, what exactly are you saying here?
>
> It could be a safe assumption that if your bot can launch a block
over more than
> eight feet of the play area and still hit a child's eye with enough
force to
> cause injury, then that would be firing bricks violently?
>
> OR
>
> It could be a safe assumption that if you bot can launch a block over
more than
> eight feet of the play area, it could still hit a child's eye with
enough force
> to cause injury. That would be firing bricks violently?
>
> I refer you to this helpful comic:
>
> http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2002/10/11
>
> Calum
Calum,
I wish Lugnet had the ability to edit ones own post. This thread could
have ended with a few simple corrections
Allow me to re-state.
---snip-----
MORE specifically: It would be a safe assumption for me to say that if
your bot can launch a block over a distance of more than 8 feet of the
play area, and still hit a child's eye with enough force to cause
injury, then, I would consider that to be "firing bricks violently."
---end-----
Does that clear things up?
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
