To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 10192
10191  |  10193
Subject: 
Re: Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:32:58 GMT
Viewed: 
3047 times
  
In lugnet.mediawatch, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler writes:
> 
> > I expect that many of those investigated have spoken English and have worn
> > shoes; do either of these facts relate to the crimes of which the
> > individuals are accused?
> 
> Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes
> did to Imelda Marcos?

  As I recall, there was an old lady who lived in a shoe.

> QED.

  What does quantum electrodynamics have to do with it?!?

> XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to o-t.debate, IMHO.

  Eek!  I thought I'd set FUT ot.debate.  Obviously the computer made an error.

     Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
 
(...) Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes did to Imelda Marcos? QED. 1 - Apologies to any "Life of Brian" or "Red Shoe Diaries" fans out there XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

39 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR