To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 10192
10191  |  10193
Subject: 
Re: Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:32:58 GMT
Viewed: 
959 times
  
In lugnet.mediawatch, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler writes:

I expect that many of those investigated have spoken English and have worn
shoes; do either of these facts relate to the crimes of which the
individuals are accused?

Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes
did to Imelda Marcos?

  As I recall, there was an old lady who lived in a shoe.

QED.

  What does quantum electrodynamics have to do with it?!?

XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to o-t.debate, IMHO.

  Eek!  I thought I'd set FUT ot.debate.  Obviously the computer made an error.

     Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
 
(...) Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes did to Imelda Marcos? QED. 1 - Apologies to any "Life of Brian" or "Red Shoe Diaries" fans out there XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

39 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR