Subject:
|
Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:46:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
634 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Hietbrink writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
>
> > Most of BPS's scenes in the BT *aren't* MOCs, but rather pics of minifigs with
> > talk bubbles
>
> That assumes a particular definition of MOC. One could argue that "Take
> hairpiece A, put it on top of head B, on torso C, with legs D" is as much a
> MOC (albeit a very simple one) as "Take brick A, stick it on plate B, etc".
Good luck in court;-)
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
| (...) That assumes a particular definition of MOC. One could argue that "Take hairpiece A, put it on top of head B, on torso C, with legs D" is as much a MOC (albeit a very simple one) as "Take brick A, stick it on plate B, etc". Bruce (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
