| |
In lugnet.mediawatch, James Trobaugh writes:
>
> Wow, that would be interesting if LEGO was taking a position against the
> site after Brad J. had made favorable statements about the site at BricksWest.
I'm not sure he actually praised the BT directly (in fact he mentioned that
there are people who have a problem with it), but offered support for BPS's
*creativity*. He said that TLC trusts its brand to its fans, "even BPS"--
that's not to say that they may think that that trust has been violated.
Even so, I think what may be happening here is that when you lie down with
dogs, you wake up with fleas. Though BPS may be successfully treading a thin
line, there are certainly those out there who are taking his work and have
stepped way over it.
I agree that it is a difficult situation, but I think that if BT is being used
to promote such unhealthy values as expressed in the article, TLC has the right
to step in and protect its brand where it sees fit.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
| (...) That's not an unreasonable interpretation, though one needs to be careful to avoid baby-with-the-bathwater reasoning. Brendan can hardly be held accountable for the actions of his audience, just as Martin Scorsese can't be blamed for (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
