To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.mediawatchOpen lugnet.mediawatch in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 MediaWatch / 966
965  |  967
Subject: 
Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:17:18 GMT
Viewed: 
6411 times
  
In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler writes:

> I expect that many of those investigated have spoken English and have worn
> shoes; do either of these facts relate to the crimes of which the
> individuals are accused?

Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes
did to Imelda Marcos? QED.

1 - Apologies to any "Life of Brian" or "Red Shoe Diaries" fans out there

XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to o-t.debate, IMHO.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
 
(...) As I recall, there was an old lady who lived in a shoe. (...) What does quantum electrodynamics have to do with it?!? (...) Eek! I thought I'd set FUT ot.debate. Obviously the computer made an error. Dave! (24 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
 
(...) That's not an unreasonable interpretation, though one needs to be careful to avoid baby-with-the-bathwater reasoning. Brendan can hardly be held accountable for the actions of his audience, just as Martin Scorsese can't be blamed for (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)

39 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR