Subject:
|
Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:59:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1264 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> Looking at the dates, it's possible that the Sunday Mail article prompted
> Brad's comments in the first place, but that's mere speculation. I think
> what we have on our hands here is just another case of terrible British
> sensationalist journalism.
It pains me to say it, but the Sunday Mail is actually a Glasgow based Scottish
paper [sister to the Daily Record]. The story is typical of the anti-paedophile
hysteria which grips UK tabloids [whilst exploiting the sexuality of
"teen-idols"].
Whilst I accept some may find the BT bad taste, it is clearly nowhere near the
level the "Lego Porn" images [which have been published in mainstream UK
magazines as a 'fun' item].
Personally, I fear for the day that Islamist extremists exploit the brick to
purvey their evil message. ;)
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
| (...) I appreciate the concern, but I don't have any reason to believe that anything in that article is anything close to the truth. From what I could tell, it was first published on 9 February, so if there was actually some move on behalf of The (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
