Fun : 10191


Off-Topic / Fun / 10191	10190 \| 10192

Subject:	Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:17:18 GMT
Viewed:	185 times

In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler writes: > I expect that many of those investigated have spoken English and have worn > shoes; do either of these facts relate to the crimes of which the > individuals are accused? Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes did to Imelda Marcos? QED. 1 - Apologies to any "Life of Brian" or "Red Shoe Diaries" fans out there XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to o-t.debate, IMHO. ++Lar

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
(...) As I recall, there was an old lady who lived in a shoe. (...) What does quantum electrodynamics have to do with it?!? (...) Eek! I thought I'd set FUT ot.debate. Obviously the computer made an error. Dave! (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
(...) That's not an unreasonable interpretation, though one needs to be careful to avoid baby-with-the-bathwater reasoning. Brendan can hardly be held accountable for the actions of his audience, just as Martin Scorsese can't be blamed for (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)

39 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search