|
|
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
| | Re: level of debate
|
| (...) Please tally all protests and render the percentage of those that took place naked. And what's wrong with pink? I mean, other than I won't be seen in it? :-) You seem to be taking the cheap-shot demonizing route in trying to belittle a (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
| | Re: Megan's Law, and its implications
|
| (...) I agree that in many cases the parent would want to help, and a properly raised kid should want to be productive around the house. (...) Ok, it did seem reasonable that the parental obligation mostly ends when the child attains (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
| | Re: Gulf of understanding is mutual
|
| (...) The difference between Dubya-Dubya III and Desert Storm may well be that in the latter, the Iraqi soldiers knew they were in the wrong in the first place and didn't have any heart in holding Kuwait. This time it is about defending Iraq and we (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.277) |
|
| | Re: Megan's Law, and its implications
|
| (...) Hmm, does that never mean that the parent has an obligation to support the child if the child loses his/her job in a layoff after attaining self sufficiency? How is this modified when rape is involved? How do we hold the rapist responsible for (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
| | stunningly geedy people
|
| Today I learned I am being sued because almost two years ago I barely bumped the back of a guys explorer. I hit the part that holds the trailer hitch; there was no hitch on there though. It was pouring rain and when I stopped at the light I slid a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| property (score: 0.276) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
| | Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
|
| (...) Thanks Larry--my apologies for being abrupt. (...) DEW? Most times I love acronyms... (...) To this I agree--throwing our hats into the same ring as those who commit atrocities is the wrong thing to do. But here we sit in the 21st centruy, in (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
| | Re: level of debate
|
| (...) And that in 1940 the xenophobic US weren't in the war at all whilst the Allies were fighting and dieing for freedom against tyranny, the US didn't get into it until the end of '41, but they'll take all the credit for winning the war... History (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
| | Re: level of debate
|
| (...) Well, be fair. Almost all are unattributed or from comedians. And Limbaugh is hardly an icon of thoughtful debate. That leaves Roy Blount and Rumsfeld. Nuff said... (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
| | Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
|
| (...) As I've mentioned, I deplore this stupid, unjustified, pre-emptive, and distracting war. Having said that, my impression has been that France, China, and Russia are particularly demonized at least in part because they have presented themselves (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
| | Light topic (ish...)
|
| (URL) which people voiced concern over a television commercial and the company pulled said commercial off the airwaves. In this commercial a dog, via computer finess, is seen coming out of a persons mouth, signifying 'dog breath' in the morning. (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.276) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.276) |