|
| |
|  
rights, property
(score: 0.629)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) That's not what's being debated here. The public display of sexual orientation is. There is a hugely vast difference between having an orgy in the nearest intersection and publicly acknowledging that your SO shops in the same section of the (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| | Re: “family-safe” ? (Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) What does this term mean? (...) Just to be clear, cancelling posts without prior request by the author is exceedingly rare here (it has happened one time in the entire history of the site and that was to avoid legal action and was done when (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| | Re: Some Lego buying stats
|
| (...) Hi again, Selcuk (sorry I don't know how to type the proper "c"!), All of the answers to your question so far have been pretty representative of the middle class (and we are probably more highly educated on Lugnet than average), but I don't (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Good. So do I. Fortunately, that wasn't what I said. What I said was that if you are not willing to suffer for your art, you are not a worthy ARTIST, not that your art isn't worthy. I would say that to be true for any endeavour. If you expect (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) Bush would never upset his friends. (...) Well a certain "mordern country" is assiting human rights abuses in countries like Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Yemen & Pakistan whilst breaking internatioanl law itself. What does that have to do with (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.628)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) But there's a reason that the past is in the past. The world as Jefferson (whose idea of property, by the way, included certain individuals who were not duly compensated for their labor in his service) perceived it is largely irrelevant to the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) Actually, I hadn't seen that piece, but I cited a few yesterday with the same sentiments (URL) HERE> (...) Is not the market a two-way street? They should need us as much as we them. (...) And therein lies the rub. Sure, what's the difference (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.627)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) I mean dominating other nations through unethical trading practicing or harsh sanctions or expoitating human labor and natural resources of other nations. There's no morality in using force to "defend" our greedy business ventures and economic (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.626)
|
