To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3297
3296  |  3298
Subject: 
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:34:46 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@novera.=spamcake=com
Viewed: 
1899 times
  
<3874CFB7.C78E8E40@voyager.net> <slrn879jtn.95s.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Matthew Miller wrote:

Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
I see ideas as property of the inventor. From a rights basis, that means
that the inventor has the right to do with them as he or she sees fit.
From a utilitarian basis, if we don't incent the inventor, we don't get
new ideas.

From a rights basis (the utilitarian basis is clear) does it follow that the
inventor has the right to prevent other people from coming up with the exact
same idea on their own?

I'm not sure. I haven't carried out an exhaustive analysis of the rights
involved. I would tend to say not, as long as the idea was developed
independently and without knowledge of the first inventor's work...
(that is, merely using a cleanroom and trying to match the features
using an independent team doesn't count... you have to truly come up
with the same idea without knowledge that it's already been done. That
may not work practically, though, I dunno.)

But I freely admit I am not sure here. My beef with Jasper is that he
seems to have some notion that ideas are NOT property but isn't willing
to state what his idea is or defend it, he merely is going for sound
bites instead of engaging in sound debate.

I think I'll ignore him and debate you instead as you're on much firmer
ground, debate principle wise... you seem to actually be debating.

What's your thinking on this, if you posit that ideas ARE property? Are
they unique or are they reproducable?

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)



Message has 2 Replies:
  Patents and IP and stuff (was Re: Goodness of Man? etc)
 
(...) What happens in the case of "obvious" developments? "Obvious" is of course difficult to judge (which is why it merits quotation marks) but take this theoretical example: I live in a very primitive society. We've just started developing ideas. (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) I think ideas are not identical to physical items, and therefore not identical to physical property. But it is very useful to extend our concepts for dealing with physical property to the realm of ideas. Tangent: this is something to be (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) OK, what's your proposal, then? If they're not property, what are they? and how do the people that come up with them get incented? I ain't gonna invent stuff for you for free, you know... and neither is anyone else. Those 20,000 failed light (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR