Subject:
|
Patents and IP and stuff (was Re: Goodness of Man? etc)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 19:34:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@/saynotospam/mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
1739 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> I'm not sure. I haven't carried out an exhaustive analysis of the rights
> involved. I would tend to say not, as long as the idea was developed
> independently and without knowledge of the first inventor's work...
> (that is, merely using a cleanroom and trying to match the features
> using an independent team doesn't count... you have to truly come up
> with the same idea without knowledge that it's already been done. That
> may not work practically, though, I dunno.)
What happens in the case of "obvious" developments? "Obvious" is of course
difficult to judge (which is why it merits quotation marks) but take this
theoretical example:
I live in a very primitive society. We've just started developing ideas. For
example, we're just getting numbers figured out. So far, as a society, we've
worked out "one", "two", "three". On Monday, someone figures out "four", on
Tuesday, someone else figures out "five". Then, on Wednesday, I wake up
before everyone else, 'cause I ate some bad sabre-toothed tiger for supper
and had a rough night. I get up before sunrise, and invent "six". Then, I
start painting it everywhere and yelling "six six six" until everyone else
wakes up and hears me.
Do I then have ownership of the concept of six? Must everyone else ask me
first before counting that high?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
