To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 80
79  |  81
Subject: 
Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 3 Nov 1998 20:19:27 GMT
Viewed: 
618 times
  
Steve Bliss wrote in message <363efd9e.2257101@lugnet.com>...

BTW, I notice the past tense in your description.  Are you saying that
these capabilities no longer exist?


To the best of my knowledge they decommissioned the auto-launch missile
right before they declassified it (about five years ago), so it's not in use
anymore.  As for the rest of the system, it is still up, but we're shutting
down many of our operations IAW recent treaties.  We had a missile base in
MO that's been completely shut down and converted into a B-2 base.

Jesse

__________________________________________________________________
Jesse The Jolly Jingoist
Looking for answers?
Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! http://www.multicon.de/fun/legofaq.html
Power-search in Deja News! http://www.dejanews.com/home_ps.shtml



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
(...) I'm not sure if this makes me feel better or worse about America's nuclear capabilities. Technically, it sounds 'cool', assuming it would actually work right under field conditions. But any discussion of making it easier to launch nukes gives (...) (26 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

37 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR