Subject:
|
Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 03:31:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
190 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 03:16:00 GMT, "David Zorn" <David_Zorn@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Todd, if we want to discuss something other than Lego - the brand - do
> we have to do it in this section?
I would say that lego-clone discussions are just as appropriate in the
lego.* groups as they are on rec.toys.lego
Certainly, I enjoy reading about them. Even if I am not sure I'd buy
any.
.debate is more for topics that lead to two highly polarized camps.
They can discuss things to death that neither is likely to ever
convince the other of.
Sarah Heacock
sarah@eskimo.coms
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
| Perhaps a Princess.... wrote in message <3621e044.4881529@20...63.236>... (...) I'm telling you, I will convince everyone that the Russians could never have hurt us at any time during the Cold War even had they tried too.;-> There is no such thing (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
