To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 33
32  |  34
Subject: 
Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:35:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1090 times
  
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998 01:03:56 GMT, "Matt Marshall"
<Matt@rapturesoft.hypermart.net> wrote:
> Plus there are missile defense systems out there, and I'm sure that Silos
> have some sort of defense, The military isn't that stupid(1).
> 
> (1)I really hope they aren't

Maybe not stupid, but have you ever heard of the ABM treaty?  I
believe the gist of it is that it prohibits Anti-Ballistic Missile
defenses.  AFAIK, we respected that treaty, even thought the Soviets
did not.

-- Terry K --

-- Terry K --



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) It wouldn't be unimportant, sure the Ecological impacts would be horrible, but hey, most silos that I know of aren't exactly near town, and Nuclear weapons are only cumulative to a point, other than that they (...) (28 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

37 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR