To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 33
32  |  34
Subject: 
Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:35:59 GMT
Viewed: 
297 times
  
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998 01:03:56 GMT, "Matt Marshall"
<Matt@rapturesoft.hypermart.net> wrote:
Plus there are missile defense systems out there, and I'm sure that Silos
have some sort of defense, The military isn't that stupid(1).

(1)I really hope they aren't

Maybe not stupid, but have you ever heard of the ABM treaty?  I
believe the gist of it is that it prohibits Anti-Ballistic Missile
defenses.  AFAIK, we respected that treaty, even thought the Soviets
did not.

-- Terry K --

-- Terry K --



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
 
Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) It wouldn't be unimportant, sure the Ecological impacts would be horrible, but hey, most silos that I know of aren't exactly near town, and Nuclear weapons are only cumulative to a point, other than that they (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

37 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR