Subject:
|
Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:07:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
263 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Matt Marshall wrote in message ...
> They could have and if they got lucky it might have detonated over a Missile
> Silo(1). But there is now way that had we gone to war they would have caused
> us a whole lot of damage. There technology wasn't up to it. Not to mention
> they couldn't get there fighters over here to escort the bombers, and after
> the flight most bomber(2)wouldn't have enough fuel to maneuver. So no.
> Beside that we knew most of the alternate places for the USSR cabinet to
> hide and had targeted those. They didn't know all of them and it's really
> hard to bring down and EMP resistant airplane that's flying around.
>
> Mike Stanley wrote in message ...
> > So are you the person that suggests the the USSR (rememeber that's
> > what it was during the Cold War, or the CCCP if you prefer) couldn't
> > have succeeded in launching an ICBM at us?
> >
> > --
> > Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
> > http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/ (discontinued thru Holiday season)
> > 800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 ext 222 (S@H Canada)
> > www.lugnet.com/news - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide
>
> Matt Marshall
> $%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!!
> Matt's Lego Page
> http://rapturesoft.hypermart.net/mlego/
oops heres the footnotes
1)The Russians first wave was targeted at the Silos not at the prez because
he would be long gone and they knew that
2)They had to fly a really long way, except from the Siberian outposts and
those were actually targeted for California and such and those probably
would have frozen controls beside.
Matt Marshall
$%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!!
Matt's Lego Page
http://rapturesoft.hypermart.net/mlego/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
| (...) So you're not saying that they couldn't have nailed us, you're just saying that they could have only nailed missile silos. I guess you'd consider any number of nuclear explosions over missile silos and the damage that would cause to the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
| Op een zekere dag, te weten Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:07:16 GMT, klom "Matt Marshall" <Matt@rapturesoft.hy...rmart.net> in het toetsenbord en schreef ons: (...) Don't underestimate the Russians! They where the first to take a sattelite into space, the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
| They could have and if they got lucky it might have detonated over a Missile Silo(1). But there is now way that had we gone to war they would have caused us a whole lot of damage. There technology wasn't up to it. Not to mention they couldn't get (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
37 Messages in This Thread: ![Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -David Zorn (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Sarah Heacock (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matt Marshall (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Mike Stanley (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matt Marshall (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Mike Stanley (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matt Marshall (8-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Richard Dee (8-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Terry Keller (8-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jeff Stembel (1-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (2-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Steve Bliss (2-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (2-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Steve Bliss (3-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (3-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Chris Moseley (4-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matthew Marshall (4-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (5-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Richard Dee (7-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Ardjan Besse (8-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Mike Stanley (8-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Ardjan Besse (9-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (9-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matt Marshall (10-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jeff Stembel (1-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (2-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matthew Marshall (2-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jeff Stembel (3-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Jesse Long (3-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Tom McDonald (4-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matthew Marshall (4-Nov-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matthew Miller (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Sarah Heacock (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Matthew Miller (8-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Todd Lehman (7-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here? -Richard W. Schamus (10-Oct-98 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|