To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6719
6718  |  6720
Subject: 
Re: Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:45:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1275 times
  
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G2uJ31.KFo@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > I did not really intend this to be a Palestinian V Israeli debate, that • always
> > ends in looking levels of wrongness. However, if the current leader in • Iraq or
> > the former leader of serbia were to use the same methods - how would that • be
> > treated internationally? I wonder?
> 
> Are you comparing Barak, a democratically elected leader of a democratic • state
> that tolerates dissent and has a free press and the rule of law, and
> mechanisms to carry out investigations of wrongdoing and a justice system • that
> administers justice fairly, and all that it implies

So the democratically take land from those who have lived there for ~1500
years to give to those who came to Israel after the cold war ended?

> 
> I'm just asking here, because if you are, if you really don't think • there's
> any difference here, then you're more clueless than I thought. • (surprising, I
> know, I already think you're pretty clueless, but I may have actually
> underestimated that level of cluelessness on your part)

Try to be objective Larry.

> 
> And if you aren't, what is your point exactly?
> 
> Look. I'm one of the people that thinks that setting up Israel was a bad • *bad*
> BAD idea in the first place. I'm one of the people that thinks that the • entire
> mideast mess is more the fault of the UK than of anyone else. I'm not by • any
> means an Israeli sympathiser. Israel was forced into existance where it • should
> not have been, there is NO race or group or ethnicity that has a clear cut
> claim on Palestine or on any particular part of the territory, and
> partitioning Palestine was the biggest mistake those Fleet Street (or • wherever
> the foreign ministry bozos sat at the time) losers ever made. Bigger than
> India and Pakistan, even.

Who is the bigger fool? The fool, or the fool who follows him?

> 
> Palestine should never have been partitioned. No amount of subdividing • will
> work, no amount of carving off pieces of land will satisfy one group or • the
> other. All of Palestine should have been ruled by a coalition goverment
> composed of all ethnicities and the UN should have forced all ethnicities • to
> come to some accomodation, using a secular government that favored no • religion.
> 


> Israel is a democratic country with a
> rule of law and it is far better to be an Muslim in Israel than it is to • be a
> Jew in any Arab country you'd care to name, even Jordan, or even in Arafat
> administered territory.

It is still not good. Comparing it to a thing which is bad makes it look
better, but it is still not good.

> 
> What has happened of late, on the israeli side, if it involves excessive • use
> of force, will be investigated and dealt with. Can you say the same for • the
> Hezbollah? They're not going to investigate the use of excessive force! • Heck
> no, they consider any use of force to be not quite enough. Can you say the
> same for Arafat's thugs in police uniforms? I don't think so.

It is still not good. Comparing it to a thing which is bad makes it look
better, but it is still not good.

> 
> So drop the line that says that Israel is some sort of bad guy in this • latest,
> it won't wash.

Did I say that? No. If anyone cares to support the other bush in this, I'll
shout them down too.

> The bad guy is the US for forcing Israel to negotiate with
> terrorists and thugs. Do you normally negotiate with your assailant and • tell
> them that it's OK to carve off your finger and your ear but would they • mind
> not carving out your heart? Seems laugable, doesn't it?

Heart? What are you referring to?

> 
> Israel has gotten, and continues to get, a raw deal in the world media, I • have
> no idea why.

I do. It is a international pro Muslim western media conspiracy.

> 
> Having said all that I say again, Israel has no right to exist, it was • imposed
> on the region, but you can't unmake an omlette, especially by shooting the
> diners.

Omelettes can be shared.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
(...) Are you comparing Barak, a democratically elected leader of a democratic state that tolerates dissent and has a free press and the rule of law, and mechanisms to carry out investigations of wrongdoing and a justice system that administers (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

58 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR