To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6694
6693  |  6695
Subject: 
Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 17:58:30 GMT
Viewed: 
539 times
  
I did not really intend this to be a Palestinian V Israeli debate, that always
ends in looking levels of wrongness. However, if the current leader in Iraq or
the former leader of serbia were to use the same methods - how would that be
treated internationally? I wonder?

Scott A

BTW - I don't really accept that the whole of the world's media has what is
happening down your way wrong. If anything, the media here has been called pro-
Isreali of late.






In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes:
Oh dear. I knew it'd come to lugnet too sometime. I've had enough politics in
the past three weeks to last a lifetime, but here goes anyway.

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
What the US (and others)
do independent of the UN is political mumbo jumbo all based on selfish gain.

Maybe true. In fact, probably true.

Take what is happening in the middle-east right now. If the US were to
withdraw some of its dogmatic support for Israel - it would have ended
days/weeks/years ago.

Oh my.
Why *would*/*should* the US remove its so-called support for Israel?... huh.
Have you really been seeing what's going on? I can tell you a little bit.

Israel was all but ready to give the PLO about 90% of the land in the west
bank. Barak even came forth with some sort of idea regarding Jerusalem. But
Arafat was not ready for this. Letting Israel just give away the land would
put Israel as "the good guys" in the world's eyes and Arafat did not want that
(even though it's true to some extent). So the Palestinians turn the tables,
riot here and there, throw stones, make it so Israel has to use force to stop
them.
Look, I could tell you a lot about what it really is to live in Israel. But
think about this. What Barak did to stop the riots was necessary, so that Jews
living in Israel aren't afraid to walk in the streets.

The international media is doing a great job of twisting this all to make it
seem like Israel is the "big bad guy", and I'm sorry to see people really
think that way. The Palestinians could have had an independent country without
using force and violence. But they've showed pretty clearly that they will NOT
rest until Israel is wiped out.

Yet the blame is put on Israel. Sorry but I just don't buy it.

<deep breaths, Shiri, calm down>

It's very easy to put the blame when you're sitting in a safe house in the UK
or the US, watching people getting killed on TV (surely you saw the lynch of
two reserve soldiers who happened to take the wrong turn?). It's quite another
thing when your best friends see signs saying "Death to Jews" in the nearest
town, and your sister is afraid to take the bus or cab to get to the
university where she studies. Oh well. It's your right to blame whoever you
want. But if the US removes what little support it's giving .il right now,
that will give the Palestinians yet more legitimation to keep on with the
violence.

<exhale>

Sorry, but this stuff hits close to home, literally. Can't help it, really.

-Shiri



Message has 1 Reply:
  Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
(...) Are you comparing Barak, a democratically elected leader of a democratic state that tolerates dissent and has a free press and the rule of law, and mechanisms to carry out investigations of wrongdoing and a justice system that administers (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
Oh dear. I knew it'd come to lugnet too sometime. I've had enough politics in the past three weeks to last a lifetime, but here goes anyway. (...) Maybe true. In fact, probably true. (...) Oh my. Why *would*/*should* the US remove its so-called (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

58 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR