To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8136
8135  |  8137
Subject: 
Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 01:57:51 GMT
Viewed: 
4068 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> But look at this post:
> 
> http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=3842
> 
> It seems to me that, within the limits of the text only techology we use here
> for posting, MM had gone pretty far to "embed" his site in his post, short of
> replicating the whole thing in the post, that is. Should it be judged that • way?
> 
> Despite that I am not sure that I actually agree with the argument I just
> outlined that this site (based on the author's intent) should be evaluated as
> part of Lugnet due to embedding, but I wanted to outline it for completeness.

I'd agree with the argument.  And I think I'd go one step further.  If I
maintain a site at www.isecretlyhatetodd.com and I never mention it here, I'm
not sure I should be held accountable ToS-wise if someone stumbles across it
and finds out that I'm secretly a MegaBloks plant who is trying to compile
evidence to help overthrow LUGNET and TLC.

BUT - if I make a post and include a link to www.isecretlyhatetodd.com and
even go so far as to invite people over, I should be held accountable ToS-wise
for whatever is there - because not only am I providing a link to the site (as
much as one can with text) I am inviting the community here to come over.

That's what was done in this post you mention.  A link was provided, an
invitation was extended.  Perhaps the content alone shouldn't be ToS-able
(perhaps, perhaps not) but I'd sure agree that it also doesn't fall into the
category of "oh, but that's on a personal site, not on LUGNET - can't consider
it at all" with respect to judging motives, actions, etc.

Actions speak louder than words.  Actions carried out on a website to which
you invite someone that contradict words you post here can (and should, imo)
be used to balance words posted here.

There, that was relatively calm.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
G'day Mike, I've already posted my personal points on this issue: (URL) I'll reinforce them for my part... (...) Why should the ToS of this site be relevant to off-site content? If the message posting the link (exluding the link itself) abides by (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
 
Sorry for the malformed subject, it feels like it's 2 AM to me. Something has been nagging at me about one aspect of the latest... I think I want to recant some of my own words, and see if some other people do too. At least a little. Maybe it's a (...) (26 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

58 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR