Subject:
|
Re: Right on Schedule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:14:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4008 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > How does he get away with this? Are you guys stoopid?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep
> > > > > > your stoopid mouth shut?
> > > > >
> > > > > John,
> > > > > since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story?
> > > >
> > > > So what is your point? Because {I} don't stick to facts means that {you}
> > > > don't have to?
> > >
> > > Is that {really} what you thought I meant?
> >
> > Do you {really} expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what
> > you are talking about?
> >
> > But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
> > interrogatives?
>
> Who wants to know?
>
> And why do you think they are interested?
>
> Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one
> could ever want?
"Good questions outrank easy answers".
I have some of the answers. In this case, my feeling was that John was being
rather disingenuous... I was just testing my hypothesis. John chose to make
noise rather than be honest; your and Bruce's axe grinding helped him.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) Are you not the KING of the noisemakers? Is (URL) this> not the latest proof? What is it with you and your anti-Israel axe grinding? Don't you think everyone knows by now that you hate Israel? Isn't that ground plowed enough? What ever is your (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) Well, I suppose they did, though I wasn't really paying attention. I apologize if I let him off the hook too easy (and I think it is an established fact that John and I do not see eye to eye on politics or religion at all). But I do think he (...) (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) Who wants to know? And why do you think they are interested? Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one could ever want? (22 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
