To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25140
25139  |  25141
Subject: 
Re: Right on Schedule
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:13:52 GMT
Viewed: 
1048 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

   How does he get away with this? Are you guys stoopid?

Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep your stoopid mouth shut?

John, since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story?

So what is your point? Because I don’t stick to facts means that you don’t have to?

Is that really what you thought I meant?

Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what you are talking about?

But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in interrogatives?

JOHN



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) Haven't you noticed that Scott debates via loaded questions? Do you think it is a communicable disease? Am I doomed to writing only questions now that I responded to this? :-0 --?Bruce?-- (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) Who wants to know? And why do you think they are interested? Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one could ever want? (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) John, Yet again you have snipped the best part of my post! (...) It takes two to tango John! Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) Is that really what you thought I meant? (...) Wow... Fox News! Even they qualified the headline with "appears"! It is strange how Scuds = Bush was right, whilst no Scuds = CIA was wrong... (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

32 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR