Subject:
|
Re: Right on Schedule???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:48:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1297 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
|
| |
| |
| |
But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
interrogatives?
|
Haven’t you noticed that Scott debates via loaded questions?
|
Did I give you reason that I didn’t?
|
Does that impact my rhetorical question one way or another?
|
What do you think?
| |
| |
| |
Do you think it
is a communicable disease?
|
Are you impuning Scott’s communicative abilities?
|
What would make you think otherwise?
|
Are you ignoring my clever wordplay?
| |
| |
| |
Am I doomed to writing only questions now that I
responded to this? :-0
|
Is that rhetorical question?
|
Is that a rhetorical question that I just questioned?
|
Are you now the green-eyed grammar police?
| |
Ascii depiction of Frank Gorshin in his Batman nemesis role?
|
:-) By coincidence, my son and I watched the original Batman movie last
night-- they don’t mak’em like they used to, do they? ;-)
^^
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Right on Schedule???
|
| (...) Does that impact my rhetorical question one way or another? (...) What would make you think otherwise? (...) Is that a rhetorical question that I just questioned? (...) Ascii depiction of Frank Gorshin in his Batman nemesis role? ??>Bruce<?? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
