Subject:
|
Re: Right on Schedule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:07:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1044 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
How does he get away with this? Are you guys stoopid?
|
Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep
your stoopid mouth shut?
|
John,
since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story?
|
So what is your point? Because I don’t stick to facts means that you
don’t have to?
|
Is that really what you thought I meant?
|
Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what
you are talking about?
|
John,
Yet again you have snipped the best part of my post!
| |
But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
interrogatives?
|
It takes two to tango John!
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what you are talking about? But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in interrogatives? JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
