Subject:
|
Re: Right on Schedule???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:14:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1273 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
|
| |
| |
| |
But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
interrogatives?
|
Haven’t you noticed that Scott debates via loaded questions?
|
Did I give you reason that I didn’t?
|
Does that impact my rhetorical question one way or another?
| |
| |
Do you think it
is a communicable disease?
|
Are you impuning Scott’s communicative abilities?
|
What would make you think otherwise?
| |
| |
Am I doomed to writing only questions now that I
responded to this? :-0
|
Is that rhetorical question?
|
Is that a rhetorical question that I just questioned?
Ascii depiction of Frank Gorshin in his Batman nemesis role?
??>Bruce<??
(my apologies to Scott, by the way, but this really isn’t that far off reality -
is it?) ;-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Right on Schedule???
|
| (...) What do you think? (...) Are you ignoring my clever wordplay? (...) Are you now the green-eyed grammar police? (...) :-) By coincidence, my son and I watched the original Batman movie last night-- they don't mak'em like they used to, do they? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
