Subject:
|
Re: Right on Schedule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:59:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1014 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
How does he get away with this? Are you guys stoopid?
|
Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep
your stoopid mouth shut?
|
John,
since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story?
|
So what is your point? Because I don’t stick to facts means that you
don’t have to?
|
Is that really what you thought I meant?
|
Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what
you are talking about?
But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
interrogatives?
|
Who wants to know?
|
What’s it to you?
| |
And why do you think they are interested?
|
Aren’t you being a little paranoid?
| |
Am I wrong to assume you don’t appreciate someone who has all the questions
one could ever want?
|
Don’t you know what you do when you assume?
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) Who wants to know? And why do you think they are interested? Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one could ever want? (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
