To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25142
25141  |  25143
Subject: 
Re: Right on Schedule
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 01:03:23 GMT
Viewed: 
1249 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:

How does he get away with this? Are you guys stoopid?

Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep
your stoopid mouth shut?

John,
since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story?

So what is your point?  Because {I} don't stick to facts means that {you}
don't have to?

Is that {really} what you thought I meant?

Do you {really} expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what
you are talking about?

But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
interrogatives?

Who wants to know?

And why do you think they are interested?

Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one
could ever want?



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) What's it to you? (...) Aren't you being a little paranoid? (...) Don't you know what you do when you assume? JOHN (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) "Good questions outrank easy answers". I have some of the answers. In this case, my feeling was that John was being rather disingenuous... I was just testing my hypothesis. John chose to make noise rather than be honest; your and Bruce's axe (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Right on Schedule
 
(...) Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what you are talking about? But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in interrogatives? JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

32 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR