Subject:
|
Re: Right on Schedule
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 01:03:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1144 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > How does he get away with this? Are you guys stoopid?
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep
> > > > > your stoopid mouth shut?
> > > >
> > > > John,
> > > > since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story?
> > >
> > > So what is your point? Because {I} don't stick to facts means that {you}
> > > don't have to?
> >
> > Is that {really} what you thought I meant?
>
> Do you {really} expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what
> you are talking about?
>
> But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in
> interrogatives?
Who wants to know?
And why do you think they are interested?
Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one
could ever want?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) "Good questions outrank easy answers". I have some of the answers. In this case, my feeling was that John was being rather disingenuous... I was just testing my hypothesis. John chose to make noise rather than be honest; your and Bruce's axe (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Right on Schedule
|
| (...) Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what you are talking about? But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in interrogatives? JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
32 Messages in This Thread: ![Right on Schedule -Dave Schuler (29-Jul-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -David Koudys (30-Jul-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Larry Pieniazek (30-Jul-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (30-Jul-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -John Neal (30-Jul-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (2-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -John Neal (2-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (2-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -John Neal (2-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -John Neal (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule??? -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule??? -John Neal (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -John Neal (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -John Neal (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![(Cancelled)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Larry Pieniazek (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Bruce Schlickbernd (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Do you mind if I modify the topic? (was Re: Right on Schedule, ... or was it? -Larry Pieniazek (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again) -Bruce Schlickbernd (4-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again) -John Neal (4-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again) -Mathew Clayson (11-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Rob Hendrix (4-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Bruce Schlickbernd (4-Aug-04 to lugnet.parts.mod)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (4-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Right on Schedule -Scott Arthur (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Further news management? -Scott Arthur (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Further news management? -Lindsay Frederick Braun (3-Aug-04 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|