 | | Right on Schedule —Dave Schuler
|
| | | If memory serves, John Kerry was supposed to give his speech tonight. So, exactly on cue, we learn that a "high level Al Qaeda operative" (unnamed as of 15:37ET) has been captured in Pakistan. Although I don't give credence to "secret master" types (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Have room at the house for your fam. until you're settled into Canada, and the selling feature (for you mayhaps) is a basement full of LEGO bricks--and I won't shun the non-LEGO elements :) I heard about the capture earlier on teh radio--a (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Dude, I think they have a cutoff at 50 or something. But you should do it anyway. (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) "it would be best if the arrest or killing of any HVT were announced on twenty-six, twenty-seven, or twenty-eight July"--the first three days of the Democratic National Convention in Boston. How does he get away with this? Are you guys (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Unless you have specific, fact based allegations to make, why not keep your stoopid mouth shut? JOHN (20 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) John, since when have you let the facts get in the way of a good story? John Neal, Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:10:12 GMT: "Scuds are flying everywhere-- where the hell did they come from? It's all been a big lie. The fact is that Bush was right." ;-) (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) So what is your point? Because I don't stick to facts means that you don't have to? (...) That was (URL) reported>. JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Is that really what you thought I meant? (...) Wow... Fox News! Even they qualified the headline with "appears"! It is strange how Scuds = Bush was right, whilst no Scuds = CIA was wrong... (...) (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Do you really expect me or anyone else to have the foggiest idea as to what you are talking about? But more importantly: will this ridiculous interchange continue in interrogatives? JOHN (20 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | (...) Haven't you noticed that Scott debates via loaded questions? Do you think it is a communicable disease? Am I doomed to writing only questions now that I responded to this? :-0 --?Bruce?-- (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Did I give you reason that I didn't? (...) Are you impuning Scott's communicative abilities? (...) Is that rhetorical question? ???? (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule??? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Does that impact my rhetorical question one way or another? (...) What would make you think otherwise? (...) Is that a rhetorical question that I just questioned? (...) Ascii depiction of Frank Gorshin in his Batman nemesis role? ??>Bruce<?? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule??? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What do you think? (...) Are you ignoring my clever wordplay? (...) Are you now the green-eyed grammar police? (...) :-) By coincidence, my son and I watched the original Batman movie last night-- they don't mak'em like they used to, do they? (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Who wants to know? And why do you think they are interested? Am I wrong to assume you don't appreciate someone who has all the questions one could ever want? (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) What's it to you? (...) Aren't you being a little paranoid? (...) Don't you know what you do when you assume? JOHN (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) "Good questions outrank easy answers". I have some of the answers. In this case, my feeling was that John was being rather disingenuous... I was just testing my hypothesis. John chose to make noise rather than be honest; your and Bruce's axe (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Are you not the KING of the noisemakers? Is (URL) this> not the latest proof? What is it with you and your anti-Israel axe grinding? Don't you think everyone knows by now that you hate Israel? Isn't that ground plowed enough? What ever is your (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) lol Like I said, you choose to make noise rather than be honest. I hate nobody. I have a dislike for Sharon, his policies and extremist Israeli nationalism in general; but I know I’m not alone in that. I also have a dislike for Palestinian (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well, I suppose they did, though I wasn't really paying attention. I apologize if I let him off the hook too easy (and I think it is an established fact that John and I do not see eye to eye on politics or religion at all). But I do think he (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Do you know that you are a bad bad person?(1) ++Lar 1 - You do know that you are bad, *not* for modifying, some of my best friends(2) modify stuff, but actually for not setting the FUT right? (3) 2 - Did you think to yourself "AND Rob (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) And proud of it, man. (...) What!?! Of course I'm bad for doing it. I am good at doing it however. (...) It had to do with axe grinding, and not specifically Lego, though Lego was in fact the medium. And how the FUT went entirely depended on (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Do you mind if I modify the topic? (was Re: Right on Schedule, ... or was it? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Do you mind if I ask a question(1) about these fine mods rather than comment directly? I was wondering how you shaped these? Xacto® knife or equivalent? Dremel® cutoff tool or equivalent? Something else? Would you be willing to share that (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) It suddenly dawned on me that I couldn't recall that I had ever seen a lugnet.parts.mod forum so I ambled back here to see that it is in fact new. X-Acto® hobby knife? No. Dremel® rotary tool? No. Victorinox® Swiss Army™ Knife! I always have (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Here's a neat little trick someone taught me about using the thumbnails automatically generated by Brickshelf. Add /thumb/image.jpg(und...)thumb.jpg and you will link to the thumb instead of the full image. So: (URL) Better yet, make the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Do you mind if I modify the topic? (Larry Puns Again) —Mathew Clayson
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) I think these look great. I may try some of these tricks. Thanks, Mat (20 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) That'd be me. Lugnet member #377, owner of (URL) modder of the brick, curator of this particular newsgroup, and all around Dremel wielding weirdo. Keep up the great modding work, and post it here! Be sure you set your FUT's right though! -Rob (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) "2 - Did you think to yourself “AND Rob Hendrix...“?" Your answer juxtaposed with Larry's question still don't make the slightest ounce of sense. :-) -->Bruce<-- p.s. you two are the guys screwing up my correctly directed post. :-) p.p.s. See! (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I'll try to take your views on board. (...) I feel better already! (...) The one left of centre gets my vote. ;) Scott A (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Right on Schedule —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) John, Yet again you have snipped the best part of my post! (...) It takes two to tango John! Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Further news management? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (URL) Further news management?> If true, one has to wonder what this is costing the economy of the USA. Scott A (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Further news management? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Oh, but didn't you hear? We're "TURNING THE CORNER!" That's right! Or was that "going 'round the bend..."? Oh well, nothing a few more Wal-Mart greeter jobs can't make up! LFB (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
