Subject:
|
Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:54:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
644 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
No, he gets to be intolerant because he doesn’t believe in tolerance - he
just doesn’t want intolerance of his intolerance, and will pretend that any
intolerance of his intolerance is the same as his intolerance itself, and
therefore said intolerance is not valid (neatly proving that under no
cirmcumstances can he ever be criticized for intolerance). :-)
|
Okay, this horse is past due for the glue factory, but I just wanted to make
this final observation. It isn’t any secret that conservatives have lower
tolerance level on most issues than liberals do. That’s why they are called
conservative;-) But because their tolerance runs out before a liberal’s does,
they are then labeled as intolerant by the Left, when the fact remains that
the Left is equally intolerant, just not as quickly as a conservative (except
for Dave! whom I believe to be a closet anarchist;-)
I believe that there are a lot of knee-jerk liberals out there who are
actually a lot more conservative than they think. I remember seeing a “quiz”
online somewhere that challenged people to test their political leanings--
I’ll see if I can dig it up and maybe we can have some fun with it.
JOHN
|
Doesn’t address my point in the slightest. Nothing more than I expected.
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
