Subject:
|
Re: Yet another push for thoughtful legislation from Tennessee
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:18:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
438 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
|
|
They arent, but youve lost me.
|
Everybody is intolerant of something which you are using in relation to
liberals being intolerant of intolerance. Translated, Liberals are as
big as jerks as racists (insert homophobes, mysoginists, etc, as
appropriate) because they are intolerant of the racists intolerance. That
is, they are somehow equal in their intolerance. That is simply one of the
stupidiest or most self-serving conclusions that I have ever seen and it is
one that is routinely used by conservatives.
You say they arent the same, but your examples contradict yourself.
|
Ah, there was my confusion. They are the same, in a manner of speaking. If
I hate clone-lovers, I am guilty of intolerance. If I am a pluralist and I
cant tolerate those who hate clone-lovers, then I am guilty of intolerance
and hypocrisy.
|
So, you are saying that those that cant stand racists arent as bad as the
actual racists, they are worse. As I said, stupid or self-serving.
|
It is the justification of the hypocrisy of the pluralists that I am trying
to understand.
|
It is the justification of racism that I am trying to understand (well, I do, it
is a game to try and put liberals in the defensive while glossing over the
faults of conservatives).
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
33 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|