To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23014
23013  |  23015
Subject: 
Re: Now that I've had a chance to see the new colors
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:03:57 GMT
Viewed: 
1758 times
  
Thomas Main wrote:

The article mentioned above is a good example of this.  Moving labor intensive
productions to an economically depressed country with high-unemployment and
lower wages is a good way to maximize profits.  Is laying people off in
high-wage countries and implying it is because of poor business performance
while hiring more people a lie?  Is it ethical?

Well, since "business performance" may reasonably be interpreted as the
measure of the company's ability to sustain higher profits, it's not
really a lie.

Further, I don't think it's a sin for a company to be motivated by the
desire to make more money, nor is it particularly wrong for them to make
what at the time is an unpopular decision in their interests of
furthering that end.  Unfair? Possibly.  Unethical?  Probably not.

>> Mark



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Now that I've had a chance to see the new colors
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Tarrabain wrote: <snip> (...) Recently this discussion between Douglas R. Clark and Mark Tarrabain brought up some issues about trust and corporate motivation. It was taken to .debate, but I would like to return it (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

31 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR