To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16636
16635  |  16637
Subject: 
Re: Poll: Majority Palestinians See Israel's Elimination as Goal
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:37:52 GMT
Viewed: 
725 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

There is no (historic) Palestine.  There is no such thing as Palestinians. • The
whole concept was made up during the last 50 years so 'we' could stop • calling
them Arab refugees.

However, you are quite wrong. The Balfour declaration (1917) quite clearly
referred to the area as “Palestine”. I have no idea when it was first • called
that, but it is certainly not a post 48’ construct.

Is the claim that "Palestine" was made up in '48?  I thought that 2500 years
ago Heroditus called the land that had been occupied by the Philistines by • the
name of Palestine.  Though I know there are references suggesting that the • name
of that land is older.  It hardly seems like a modern creation.

All that said, the 3000 years of history in that area certainly clouds the
genetic waters.  Modern natives of that area are a mix of what used to be • many
ethnic groups including Jews, Philistines and many others.  I expect that
there's more ethnic similarity between modern Palestinians and Jews than • there
is between either group and their named ancestral progenitors.

Chris

Ok let me clarify.  No one that was living on the land ever called it • Palestine
or called themselves Palestinians.  The current group of 'Arab refugees' have
adopted the name I assume to reinforce their 'ancestoral' ties to the land.
Which is odd given that in 1948 most of them had not even been there for more
than 2 or 3 years. (That is why the U.N. redefined the term 'refugee' to
represent anyone who had been living on 'land X' for 2 or more years.)


This is interesting. Let's just assume you are correct for a moment. Two
sceneries to consider:

1948
A "Palestinian" family has been living on a plot of land for 3 years. The
Israel army happens along and bulldozes the family’s house in their usual
manner. Have the family not the right to compensation at the very least?

2002
A "Palestinian" family has been living on a plot of land for 57 years. The
Israel army happens along and bulldozes their house in their usual manner to
build a "settlement" to house economic refugees from Eastern Europe. Have
the family not the right to compensation at the very least?

I read a report the other day that claimed that ~50% of suicide bombers are
from families who were made refugees in '48. ~25% suicide bombers' families
blamed their actions on a specific event perpetrated by the IDF - usually
the killing of a child. I hate the suicide bombings, but I can't help
wondering if Israel is partly to blame for them.

Scott A

A History lesson is obviously needed here.  After World War 2 the newly founded
United Nations decided to create a Jewish State so they would never be
subjected to a holocaust again.  The plot of land they choose had an ethnic
majority of Jews living on it since at least World War 1.  The surrounding Arab
countries, in an atempt to convince the U.N. not to create the country there,
sent thousands of people to settle in the land.  The U.N. ignored this ruse to
show an Arab ethnic majority and created Israel anyway. At this point the Arab
countries forced their Jewish citizens into the newly founded country. Most
Arabs who had been sent there, fled Israel of their own accord. The very same
Arab leaders who sent them, refused to let them back into their 'historical'
homes and herded them into refugee camps. This was done so they could easily
'reclaim' the land when the Israelis were removed from it.

-Mike Petrucelli



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Poll: Majority Palestinians See Israel's Elimination as Goal
 
(...) Do you mean revisionist history? ;-) (...) Do have any data which proves this? I would be interested to see it as it would mean that this is all wrong: Estimated Population of Palestine 1870-1946 Arabs (%) Jews (%) Total 1870 367,224 (98%) (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Poll: Majority Palestinians See Israel's Elimination as Goal
 
(...) This is interesting. Let's just assume you are correct for a moment. Two sceneries to consider: 1948 A "Palestinian" family has been living on a plot of land for 3 years. The Israel army happens along and bulldozes the family’s house in their (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

23 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR