To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11854
11853  |  11855
Subject: 
Re: Flag Burning
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 04:35:41 GMT
Viewed: 
879 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

> 
>  Agreed. Moreover, superfluous legislation of this sort serves only to
> provide members of Congress with public relations fodder, a la "I voted to
> protect Our Nation's Flag, so-and-so did not--what does that tell you?"

"That so-and-so understands the constitution better than you do and
therefore would make a better Member of Congress ??? ":-) Ya, that sort of
posturing makes me ill. Kind of like the guys who rail against pork but are
first at the trough for their district at logrolling time.

>  This sort of enforced veneration of an object is more or less
> indistinguishable from Secular Idolatry, and I'm not interested in being
> told what to worship.

I worship the Brick, and you should too, bub. :-)

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Flag Burning
 
(...) Agreed. Moreover, superfluous legislation of this sort serves only to provide members of Congress with public relations fodder, a la "I voted to protect Our Nation's Flag, so-and-so did not--what does that tell you?" I concur with you and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

37 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR