Subject:
|
Re: what do you think of editorals regarding the environment?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 May 2001 12:21:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
122 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher Tracey writes:
> I have never before in my life seen such misunderstanding and
> miscommunication of facts in a single editorial.
Which facts in particular? The piece seemed largely devoid of facts.
> Disregarding the
> authors philosphical points, he has almost (and potentially zero) no
> grasp of basic scientific concepts- most notably the concept of forest
> succesion.
He seems to have skyscraper succesion down pat.
> Do you believe any of it? Does it color your
> views? Should facts be checked in opinion pieces?
There's nothing to believe. No. By whom?
> I'm interested in discussing this, I think we all could learn something
> from it.
I don't know about anyone else, but I already knew that kooks were getting
published.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
