Debate : 10656


Off-Topic / Debate / 10656	10655 \| 10657

Subject:	Re: what do you think of editorals regarding the environment?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sat, 2 Jun 2001 03:49:09 GMT
Viewed:	315 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: > > > But from an evolutionary standpoint, the denial of genetic lineage is a > > > far greater crime than the gouging out of eyes. > > I suppose. But so what? The individuals are the ones who'll feel the pain in > either case, and I think most people would rather have their eyes than their > eggs. Well, in terms of this discussion, the individual is irrelevant compared to the larger, longitudinal issue we're addressing. Dave!

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: what do you think of editorals regarding the environment?
(...) Well...I'm not sure I'd say it that way. Certainly the picture over time is more relevant to the issue of population control, but you originally stated something like "it's more of a crime if you look at it genetically." The criminality of (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: what do you think of editorals regarding the environment?
(...) not (...) I suppose. But so what? The individuals are the ones who'll feel the pain in either case, and I think most people would rather have their eyes than their eggs. (...) kids (...) and I (...) So far, I think I'm winning. I've spent more (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

29 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search