 | | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
(...) Jones is always a treat. I don't think Ms. Eleniak did too badly, considering that the part was only written with two things in mind. Anyway, it's not like the role (or the film) allowed deep character development. (...) I couldn't remember (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
Dave Schuler at orrex@excite.com wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> Hmm, I rather like Robin Hood. I think all the actors in it are quite good. Bearing in mind that Kevin Costner isn't an "actor" ;^) ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
(...) The only good thing about Under Siege is Tommy Lee Jones. I should note that Segal is at least a better actor than the bimbo in that movie (damned with faint praise <g>). I liked Segal in Executive Decision - I got to cheer when he died! (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
(...) I refuse to allow myself to think of Costner in those terms. (...) Costner fails more spectacularly than Segal is allowed to because Costner presumes more spectacularly than Segal is allowed to. I understand that On Deadly Ground (what was (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
(...) You also think the top less scene with Erika Eleniak was that movies greatest part huh? ,) Steven Segal, yes. Quite bad. But at least I saw the movies to the end, I don't know how many Jean Claude Van Dam movies I've turned off though... (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
(...) You left out Producer and Director... (...) Hey now. The Postman wasn't *dreadful*. It could have been a LOT better, mind you, as anyone who read the book would attest, but it wasn't as bad a mangle of a good book as Starship Troopers was. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
|
(...) Steve, I think you posted to the wrong group. This group is for debates--NOT undeniable truths! Segal is so unbelievably awful that the best thing you can say about him is that Under Seige didn't suck quite as bad as his other films, but Segal (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: How talentless IS Steven Segal
|
|
(...) Possibly. I am not sure who, though. Remember it's much easier to name someone the "best so far" because the best tend to rise to be visible, but the worst fortunately (in most cases anyway) stay obscure. (...) I have, unfortunately, seen some (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
|
(...) The "6 million Jews"/"12 million people" confusion has been prevalent for a long time. A reasonable speculation would be that the holocaust most primarly did target Jews, and they are also the largest demographic of holocaust survivors, and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | How talentless IS Steven Segal
|
|
With all this anti - Micheal Crichton bile going around I can't help thinking that we should fix Steven Segal's wagon first. Is their a martial artist with less acting talent and a worse on-screen persona than him? I wouldn't like to see their films (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A question of remembrance...
|
|
Hey Y'all: I have a series of related comments and questions about how we should remember the holocaust. (And boy, do I have a bad feeling about raising these issues -- but here they come...) Frankly, I just don't get something about Holocaust (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: was (RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver) RCX & VC
|
|
(...) Hi Eric. I agree to a point, but I use LegOS because I'm a programmer and I like getting dirty. And it does allow me to do things RCX code can't - I used it on my tower crane www.lugnet.com/~469/...towercrane so I could control both RCXs with (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: was (RCX+PC=Rubik's Cube Solver) RCX & VC
|
|
Hi Eric, first of all, i understand your motivation and i think it's a nice approach to lego !! I've only got some annotations. When only using "out of the box" stuff you should let the other people know this point of view. (Other people might have (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on prayer
|
|
(...) that. Yes, exactly. Moslems acknowledge Jesus only as a prophet, not as God as most Christians do. They do believe in the immaculate conception but also make note that Jesus had siblings. Actually, the Koran makes a lot more sense than the (...) (24 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Pic: New Green Building
|
|
Whoa, Gentleman may I make a freindly Observation, - Please, just 'cause I stumbled onto this thread. Well, you Train guys are a tight lot. Meaning, a great deal of thought goes into a given layout as a whole. Now that's not to say that others (...) (24 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: medical records
|
|
(...) Thanks for the cite... two points. It's a one-time blanket consent (who's not going to consent if the alternative is no treatment?), and this is the standard that applies to orgs, not to the government. The government is exempt from it and can (...) (24 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: medical records
|
|
If this is the same act a read about a while ago, I think you'll have to give your consent before your data may be used: (URL) the rules, health care organizations would need to have patients sign a one-time consent agreement allowing their health (...) (24 years ago, 16-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on prayer
|
|
(...) Okay, but the only problem with that is that Jesus claimed to be more than a prophet. I mean that's what got him killed was the "blasphemy" of referring to himself as "I Am." I'm sure the Moslems have a problem with that. By calling Jesus a (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | medical records
|
|
I've mentioned various government anti-privacy initiatives here in the past, and the anti-initiatives that various organizations have started to try to counteract them, with varying levels of success. The group has with varying levels of (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on prayer
|
|
(...) Actually, you'd enjoy the Moslem's perspective on Jesus (which I agree with) as a prophet who took care of business. Moslem's acknowledge the willful, uncorruptable, rebellious personality of Jesus--standing up for the oppressed, weak and poor (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
