Subject:
|
Re: How talentless IS...?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:31:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
246 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> The only good thing about Under Siege is Tommy Lee Jones. I should note
> that Segal is at least a better actor than the bimbo in that movie (damned
> with faint praise <g>).
Jones is always a treat. I don't think Ms. Eleniak did too badly,
considering that the part was only written with two things in mind. Anyway,
it's not like the role (or the film) allowed deep character development.
> I liked Segal in Executive Decision - I got to cheer when he died!
I couldn't remember the name of that one. That was a nice moment!
> > Worse, Costner imagines himself not only as an actor but as a worthwhile
> > social commentator.
> I liked him in Silverado, but that was about it. He's about the most wooden
> actor in existence.
No Way Out was okay, too. If he and Keanu are ever in a movie together,
it'll have termites.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How talentless IS...?
|
| (...) The only good thing about Under Siege is Tommy Lee Jones. I should note that Segal is at least a better actor than the bimbo in that movie (damned with faint praise <g>). I liked Segal in Executive Decision - I got to cheer when he died! (...) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
