Subject:
|
Re: How talentless IS Steven Segal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 07:06:54 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ssgore@superonline.[stopspam]com
|
Viewed:
|
220 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Lane writes:
> > With all this anti - Micheal Crichton bile going around I can't help
> > thinking that we should fix Steven Segal's wagon first. Is their a martial
> > artist with less acting talent and a worse on-screen persona than him?
>
> Possibly. I am not sure who, though. Remember it's much easier to name
> someone the "best so far" because the best tend to rise to be visible, but
> the worst fortunately (in most cases anyway) stay obscure.
>
> > I wouldn't like to see their films if their was. How do his "films" keep
> > getting made? Does anyone PAY to see them? HAS anyone seen, ANY of them?
>
> I have, unfortunately, seen some on TV, but I have never PAID.
>
> Not to hijack the thread, but is there anyone who *doesn't* like Jackie Chan?
>
> ++Lar
I never went to cinema to see his films, but I try to catch every piece
when aired on TV. The part that I like most is "these stupid things
occurred while filming" part that at the end of most of his films.
Do you see the one with a very big wind tunnel?..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How talentless IS Steven Segal
|
| (...) Possibly. I am not sure who, though. Remember it's much easier to name someone the "best so far" because the best tend to rise to be visible, but the worst fortunately (in most cases anyway) stay obscure. (...) I have, unfortunately, seen some (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
