 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: <Snip other peoples comments> (...) John, Does this mean that you are using instructions to build your inventories or are you using actual MISB set contents? The latter would be a lot more accurate, (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) That is a misleading story (go figure!) The overwhelming majority of US troops in Iraq are positive, incouraged, and invested in their work. Many there are re-ups. Yeah, there will always be a few malcontents. But don't make the misteak in (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
--snip-- (...) Such a vast banquet of irony in so few words. (...) I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Would you care to show one of these 'emails with pictures' that you refer to? Since I don't remember ever sending you an email in (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you. Regardless of what the page number was, the inventory is incorrect. Valium might be in the future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down. Let's remove all (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) Well, maybe. And then again (URL) maybe not.> Dave! (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) And yet one of the corrections you made has already been shown to be wrong and maybe a second one too (I don't know and I don't care if it is or isn't). Most people might take that as a sign that possibly their checking wasn't quite as (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) Look at page 11 then, what I post here is quick, I sit for a very long time when I make the corrections and do not quote pages or steps. However you want to cut it, there are two tan bricks that are not in the inventory. That is the important (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) Yes, it sure does. I rechecked it (page 7 that is), and I stand by my statement; no tan bricks. Perhaps your own inability to count has had a bad impact on the inventories you've made, and that's why they're not being accepted. David (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) That would seem like a fair compromise between risk and reward to me. Tim (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) Well, I'd rather see them all pay the fee beforehand, then be compensated (fee returned, nice lunch, whatever) after there's an indication how good the finances are (which is usually fairly apparent by the end of the public expo). ROSCO (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Which bit? The liar bit, or the friend bit? You're coming along nicely, though. You'll be a fully-fledged CTOPper in no time. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) It's just an expression, Al. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) That's a bold assertion. Got any proof? (...) Is calling someone a liar, a troll and a jerk any way to treat a friend? (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) You, sir, are a liar. (...) If there is anyone on this board who would recognize mockery, my friend, it would be you. JOHN (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) It's just a turn of phrase, John. (...) Far be it from me to attempt to insult one as virtuous as yourself. (...) Are you mocking me? It certainly reads that way to me. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Experiencing temporal disturbances? I believe I asked you what you were talking about previous to that statement. You are obfuscating. Perhaps so much so that you've confused even yourself. (...) Ah, is that your expert opinion as one who (...) (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Even if I thought I had anything to prove to you, John, I can't without knowing what 'it' is. Lies? Frivolity? The Holy Spirit? Either way, I took it as an inept attempt at insulting me, and therefore not to be taken seriously, but I could be (...) (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) I thought so. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Well, admitting your ignorance is the first step on the path to enlightenment, so well done, champ. (...) Full of what, exactly? (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Squirm. Actually, I don't know, which is not coincidentally why I asked in the first place. I'll let you in on a little secret, though. I suspect that you are, as usual, full of it. Prove me wrong. Bet you won't-- or can't. JOHN (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) You, know - "things" (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Really. So what exactly are you "strongly" suggesting that I internalize? JOHN (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament reActs
|
|
Hi, Nathan. (...) So noted. :) Though I've moved this to ot.debate because it isn't really a discussion of the LEGO constructions themselves nor how I've chosen to illustrate Bible passages with LEGO. (...) Hmm. I actually thought it was one of the (...) (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Perfectly normal expression, at least here in Aus. It roughly translates as 'I strongly suggest you internalise things, and move on." (...) I'm not sure it meets his stringent criteria, but I appreciate the gesture, so I'll just say (...) (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) "Pull your head in"? "hypocrit"? Austroll. Ha, think Richie will add that to his (URL)? (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Pull your head in, hypocrit. (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the *individual* can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the *individual* can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Hi, all-- This is yet another example of why one's faith should color one's decisions. I make a living working for a Bible School. I would be considered "Evangelical" and/or "Conservative" by a good many people. I attend church when I'm not on (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Why don't they just call the position 'His Holiness The President' and be done with it? It seems to be what they (unreasonably) expect from him, and any candidates for the position, anyway (and 'they' are not just religious people either). (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) It's completely hypocritical. I understand why people might think divorces are relevant. They're a character issue. And like it or not, people judge others based on character. If you've been arrested 11 times for various robberies, thefts, or (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) I read it later and I should have specified that--one does *not* need to be perfect to criticise. However, people pointing out that Rudy is *bad* because of his divorces (however public they may have been) when they themselves have sexual (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(...) Well, you are implying that one needs to be perfect to criticize, which I don't think is fair. But I will say that I don't think that particular issue has anything to do with the job for which Wudy is wunning. (...) One bad apple (or bushel;-) (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
|
(URL) Tennessee (AP) -- A Southern Baptist leader said Tuesday that evangelical voters might tolerate a divorced presidential candidate, but they have deep doubts about GOP hopeful Rudy Giuliani, who has been married three times. " Yeah, and i have (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Lego Ban' at Seattle School Fueled by Anti-Private Property Crusaders
|
|
(...) Right! Anyone should be allowed to walk into your home, treat your house with disrespect, and call you evil when you object. (...) Of course, because civil engineering has taught us that all humans of every culture fit very neatly and easily (...) (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Lego Ban' at Seattle School Fueled by Anti-Private Property Crusaders
|
|
(...) Hmm. If I was a kid in this class I'd steal my teacher's car. How could they press charges, given their professed beliefs? Bruce (18 years ago, 28-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
This is directed to all people who would like to see sanctions against Ross. (...) I am so sorry that I haven't received Ross' and Eric's emails regarding this matter (both sent before Bob's posting), because if I would have received one of them or (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) Gimme a break. This is a prank gone wrong, not an abuse of power. Deleting all of a member's posts, or breaking links in a way that couldn't be restored, that would be an abuse. This was actually a little bit funny (and a little mean, I (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) So it's OK for you to abuse administrative privilege, as long as only one or two people are bothered by it? Especially if one of the two is a person that a significant people on LUGNET feel it's OK to bully? I just have to post here to say I (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(...) No. The admins will determine if I crossed any line, and take action as necessary. (...) Firstly, that has nothing to do with the point I was making about wanting ALL admins to be "in the loop" when someone "contacts admin". And secondly, the (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
