Subject:
|
Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:39:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3688 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events.brickfest, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
Were the event to expect large profits then I think it would be churlish not
to extend the free entry to more volunteers. I would hope that if losses
occurred rather than the expected profit then those volunteers would pay
their registration in order to help it break even.
|
Well, I’d rather see them all pay the fee beforehand, then be compensated (fee
returned, nice lunch, whatever) after there’s an indication how good the
finances are (which is usually fairly apparent by the end of the public expo).
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
| (...) That is why I said 'of sufficient involvement' and the no hard and fast rules bit you snipped. In the case of a small convention like BV then there simply aren't the funds to let all the volunteers in for free. In that case you have to set the (...) (17 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
