 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder ....
|
|
(...) I would say he would be someone's bitch before the bus rolls to a stop when he arrives. Jude (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | I wonder ....
|
|
How long Eric would last in prison?! He seems to think he'd be punching people out. I don't think he would last very long. It's a wonder he has been tolerated here. I doubt he would be tolerated anywhere else. I know that I'm just throwing gasoline (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Thanks Lar. I love you too. :kiss: I would like to add that since this post, I've had a flood of applications of people wanting to join the 'gang of trolls'. These applications are currently under consideration and I'll post an updated list un (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Wow! Such a short list! And no sign of the esteemed Messers Dulin or Arthur! Oh and you seem to have omitted your list of anti-trolls. ROSCO (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) That might be YOUR list of trolls but it's not mine. Mine is much shorter Allister, Soren, Ross I mean, really... putting kind, helpful, courteous, and thoughtful David Koudys in the same list as Allister? That's a bit of a stretch. Hope that (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Hmmm, well lets list this so-called "Gang of trolls" shall we? (In no particular order) (URL) Timothy Gould> (URL) Soren Roberts> (URL) Mark Neumann> (URL) David Koudys> (URL) Jeff Stembel> (URL) Keith Goldman> (URL) Bryce McGlone> (URL) (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Awww (was: IRON MECHA...)
|
|
(...) No Paul, you are not speaking only for yourself. It's a safe bet that you are speaking for virtually all women. I'd say much of the righteous indignation in this thread is misplaced. And I also agree with LFB, Lugnet sure ain't what it used to (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Is this in fact what Jeremy was refering to? (URL) know LUGNET doesn't have a list of "okay swearwords", but I'd think if stated as "BS" it'd go by unnoticed. I haven't read every post in this thread yet, just the ones which have come through (...) (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Is that a 'no' to the first statement, second or both? Legoswami (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) No, you suck too. (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) By posting it in .geek are you implying Tim is a geek or are you trying to defy us evil oppressors again by posting it in the wrong group? Just asking. Legoswami (19 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
|
(...) But they also don't believe there isn't a god. Could you call it 'soft religion'? (...) Surely it only takes the exposing of one 'ungodly' act to discredit anyone using belief in god as an election platform. How hard could that be? a (19 years ago, 27-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Xmodz_lego
|
|
(...) Pull your head in. If you've got issues with people polluting lugnet, take it up with Eric, not me. Your post is no different to mine, I just happen to take a more satirical tack than just telling people to 'shut up'. Have a nice day. a (19 years ago, 27-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Xmodz_lego
|
|
(...) That wasn't made clear from the initial post, nor the bump post. My telepathy is a little sketchy at the moment, and I wasn't able to divine that from the random pictures of non-lego cars on 'scenery' that any six year old would be proud of (...) (19 years ago, 27-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
|
(...) I've heard the argument that since an agnostic doesn't actively believe in god, they are technically a subset of atheists. I might call it 'soft atheism' versus 'hard atheism.' This is actually something I've been thinking about recently. How (...) (19 years ago, 24-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Ultimate Discussion (was: Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!)
|
|
(...) Ahhh, but see is unrestrained murder of thousands of your subjects "more ultimate" than the murder of the guy that breaks into your house? If so, how can murder be the "ultimate crime"? If not, why do they carry different sentences? (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
|
(...) lol, my veiled point was making a distinction between the definition of the term "atheism" and one such as "agnostic", which I assume that you are (technically). JOHN (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
|
(...) Probably true, and it's a shame. We've discussed Pat Robertson before, and what a shame it would be if he were everyone's idea of a "typical" Christian. (...) I hear that all the time, and it baffles me! Besides, I've told you before--if it (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
|
(...) Ha, and that study was conducted in my own backyard! I think this is a classic case of misunderstanding. As an atheist, you have been tarred by the likes of Michael Newdow, from whom I'll bet 99% of the GP draw their conclusions about y'all. I (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
|
(URL) are not to be trusted... Dave! (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Ultimate Discussion (was: Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!)
|
|
(...) Now, now, settle down, Dave! I'm pretty sure that the word "ultimate" pre-existed some apocryphal, presidential playbook and no association with OFL whatsoever was intended. (...) Let's see. (...) See? You got it on the first try! :-) (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) All that "ultimate punishment" talk is, alas, straight from the George W. Bush buzzword lexicon. In typical Dubya fashion, it enables him to sound tough without actually taking a definitive stand. Since I know you to be a person of conviction (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) Okay, Tom, let me take a stab at justifying a position such as this one. A pro-life stance would hold that a human life above all is sacred. So, the ultimate crime would be the taking of an innocent life. Therefore, the ultimate punishment (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
Honest question - which is more ridiculous? 1 - pro-life and pro-death-penalty 2 - pro-choice and anti-death-penalty I don't know, but I see far too many conservatives that fit #1, which makes little sense. And of course I see a decent amount of (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) Yeah, O'Reilly uses his radio program to say things he wouldn't say on the telly, and vice versa--in this way, he can claim he didn't say something bigotted or factually wrong on whatever (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) Ahh, I forgot to factor in O'Reilly. I didn't even know he had a radio program. As for Howard, well, he is the poster child for much that is S & R [1] with our country. JOHN [1] Sick and Wrong (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) Good guess, but actually, it was a not-so-stern jab at Bill O'Reilly. I'm not sure, but I don't think that Howard currently has a primetime show. And anyway, he's more of a kvetcher than a whiner. Dave! (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) But if you go there, don't tell them that you know John, or you'll be summarily booted. Dave! (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) See Sore Thumbs (the webcomic) lately. I'd give you a link but not from behind this firewall... (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) Sorry. That was an inside reference to Dave! I was referring to the (URL) Democratic Underground>. (...) You could have a sample size of 1,000,000, but if it isn't random, then it is worthless. Berkeley is arguabley the most liberal place in (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) That's an inside joke between Mr. Neal and me. Nothing to do, incidentally, with discussions of the UN Embassy in Denmark, which we have all "let go." (...) I don't know about that last part, but a sample of 2,000 kids growing up in a famously (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) ???? (...) Disagree. One hundred people is a decent amount (error is proportional to 1/sqrt(sample size)). Besides, if the sample size was considered inadequate in a statistical sense by the experts in the field who review the paper (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) lol For the record, I signed up again with yet another email addy, and was summarily nuked; they must checking IPs. I have officially given up life in the underground. Pity. (...) Agreed. (...) I wasn't a whiney child (so I'm told), and I did (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) I read about this on a certain Other Forum and basically said "eh." It's a too-small sample size from a too-small geographic area. I'd say it's close to meaningless, and in any case the factors of adolescent life and parental leanings likely (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
(...) Would you explain what points you disagree with? It seems a fairly narrow but objective study to me and a surpringly well written science article about the study. Tim (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
|
I'm shocked. I'm also kidding. The most interesting thing to me about (URL) study> is the motivation of the researchers. When the day is done and the results are in, it simply amounts to patting oneself on the back. This is research? JOHN (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on the UN "Racist" poster?
|
|
(...) What-- is it "Sarcasm Day" down there? (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on the UN "Racist" poster?
|
|
(...) Well good naturedness was certainly the overwhelming impression I came away with from your post. a (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on the UN "Racist" poster?
|
|
(...) Is this yet another example of your "obvious sarcasm"? JOHN (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
