To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27682
27681  |  27683
Subject: 
Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:22:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1652 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
   --SNIP--
  
   I read about this on a certain Other Forum and basically said “eh.”

lol For the record, I signed up again with yet another email addy, and was summarily nuked; they must checking IPs. I have officially given up life in the underground. Pity.

????

Sorry. That was an inside reference to Dave! I was referring to the Democratic Underground.

  
  
   It’s a too-small sample size from a too-small geographic area. I’d say it’s close to meaningless, and in any case the factors of adolescent life and parental leanings likely weigh more upon one’s political destination that does one’s own “whininess.”

Agreed.

Disagree. One hundred people is a decent amount (error is proportional to 1/sqrt(sample size)). Besides, if the sample size was considered inadequate in a statistical sense by the experts in the field who review the paper then it would not have been published.

You could have a sample size of 1,000,000, but if it isn’t random, then it is worthless. Berkeley is arguabley the most liberal place in the US.

   --SNIP--

   What bothers me most about this (to Tim as well) is it assumes that people are cast somehow in their political viewpoints. Doesn’t make sense to assume that, it seems to me.

What it says is that about 7% of a persons political viewpoint has a correlation with their personality. Which seems reasonable to me.

The fact that the article actually discusses this is why I said it’s a pretty good science article. It’s rare to see any mention of the REAL statistical conclusions.

“Personalities” and “political viewpoints” are not quantifiable givens. What if I am pro-life and anti-death penalty? What does that make me; liberal or conservative? If there were ever gray areas, it would be in these.

JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
(...) But if you go there, don't tell them that you know John, or you'll be summarily booted. Dave! (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
Honest question - which is more ridiculous? 1 - pro-life and pro-death-penalty 2 - pro-choice and anti-death-penalty I don't know, but I see far too many conservatives that fit #1, which makes little sense. And of course I see a decent amount of (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
--SNIP-- (...) ???? (...) Disagree. One hundred people is a decent amount (error is proportional to 1/sqrt(sample size)). Besides, if the sample size was considered inadequate in a statistical sense by the experts in the field who review the paper (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR